Other--SideStart a conversation →
ENFR

Hiring pseudonymous developers: how do you vet someone who isn't doxxed?

Many strong crypto developers work under a handle, without a public name or face. Here is how to judge their work without a CV, test them safely and set up access so that no single new hire can hurt you.

Other--Side7 min read

In brief

To hire pseudonymous developers safely, judge their public work rather than a CV: code accepted by known projects, audit contest rankings and contracts they launched. Then pay for a small test task and widen access in steps, with company funds in a multisig wallet, a shared crypto account that needs several people to approve each payment.

You have found a strong developer for your crypto project. Their GitHub is full of good work and people in your Discord vouch for them. Yet you have never seen their face or learned their real name, and they intend to keep it that way. This guide explains why that is common in crypto, and how to hire pseudonymous developers safely: check their skills first, then limit your risk before you give them any access.

Why so many crypto developers stay pseudonymous

A pseudonymous developer works under a stable public name, such as a GitHub handle, that is not their legal name. That is different from being anonymous. An anonymous contributor leaves no stable identity behind, while a pseudonym builds a track record over time that you can check. In crypto slang, the opposite is being "doxxed", which means the developer's real name and face are public, usually by choice.

Two reasons explain most cases. The first is culture. Bitcoin itself was published by an author known only as Satoshi Nakamoto, and many developers in this world expect to be judged on their code rather than their CV.

The second is safety. People who work in crypto are often assumed to hold crypto, which makes them targets. Physical attacks to force victims to hand over their coins, nicknamed "wrench attacks", reached 72 verified cases in 2025, 19 of them in France.

So a candidate who will not share their name is not a warning sign in itself. Many of the people you want to hire have good reasons to stay private.

What changes when you hire pseudonymous developers

You will often meet these developers on GitHub, Discord or Reddit rather than LinkedIn. Once you have, the usual hiring tools disappear. There is no CV to check, no former employer to call and no background check. You judge the person on what they have done in public, and on what they do for you.

The risk is real, because a hidden name can also hide a fake candidate. North Korea runs schemes in which IT workers use stolen identities and fabricated personas to get hired by companies abroad. Once hired, some of them have copied company code and then demanded a ransom.

So the useful question is a practical one. What could this person do with the access you give them, and how quickly would you notice?

How to vet a developer without a CV

Without a CV, you look at public work first, then at what the person does in a controlled test. Each check covers a different risk, so combine several.

Start with their GitHub history, and look past the grid of green squares that counts their activity. Open their pull requests, the code changes they proposed to other projects, and see whether the people who run those projects accepted them. A name on a change proves little on its own, because anyone can type any author name into it. Changes signed with a key tied to the account carry a "Verified" badge on GitHub, which is stronger evidence. To confirm the account is theirs, ask them to post a short message you choose from it.

Then look at audit results. Many crypto developers build a reputation by finding bugs in smart contracts, the programs that run on a blockchain. Platforms such as Sherlock run audit contests, open competitions where researchers race to find these bugs, and publish researcher rankings. Look for your candidate's handle there.

Check their history on the blockchain too. If they say they launched a smart contract, look it up on a block explorer, a public website such as Etherscan that displays everything recorded on a blockchain. It shows which address created the contract. Then ask your candidate to sign a short message of your choosing from their wallet, the app that holds the keys to that address. Wallets use this kind of signature to log people in to apps, and only the person who controls the address can produce it.

Ask who can vouch for them. A reference from a founder or open source lead who has worked with the handle, and who has a public reputation to lose, is worth more than a crowd of anonymous fans. Then check that the story holds together. Details that don't match from one profile to another, or a surprisingly thin portfolio site, deserve a direct question.

Ask for a live call with the camera on, even if they keep their name to themselves. A refusal of any live contact deserves a question too. A call alone proves little, though, because some fake candidates have used face-swapping software during video interviews.

Finally, test the work itself. Give them a small, real task from your to-do list, paid at a fair rate. Watch how the person asks questions and whether others can review their code easily. If that goes well, start with a short contract with a fixed scope before any long-term arrangement.

How to limit the risk once they start

Good vetting lowers the risk. Your setup decides how much damage one person can do.

Give access in steps. Start with what the first task needs, then widen it as trust builds.

Separate the keys. A private key is the secret that controls a wallet or a contract. No single person, and certainly no new hire, should be able to move funds or change a live contract alone. A multisig wallet solves this, because it needs several people to approve each transaction. With Safe, for example, you choose the owners and how many of them must confirm.

Review every change. Require a second person to approve code before it goes live.

Put it in writing. A short contract should cover the scope, who owns the code, what stays confidential and what happens to access when the work ends. When the engagement ends, remove access the same day.

Many pseudonymous developers will also ask to be paid in crypto. For a salaried position or control over user funds, plan a real identity check before the start date. Any role in a licensed business needs one too, which is part of why hiring in a regulated market is different. Paying someone who turns out to be under sanctions can bring civil or criminal penalties.

Where to start

  1. Decide which roles can stay pseudonymous and which need an identity check.
  2. List the access each role needs in its first month, and nothing more.
  3. Put company funds and the keys that control your contracts in a multisig wallet before the hire.
  4. Prepare a paid test task taken from your real to-do list.
  5. Check public work: code accepted by other projects, the "Verified" badge, audit rankings, contracts they launched.
  6. Ask for one live call and one reference from someone with a public reputation.
  7. Start with a short contract and widen access in steps.

Hiring with Other--Side

Other--Side recruits the key people for companies in complex, regulated markets, from the first hire to the full leadership team. Technology is one of the functions we cover, alongside compliance, operations, product and finance. Before you meet a candidate, we check them against the rules of your market. You can read more about our services, or start a conversation about the developer you are trying to hire.

  • hiring
  • crypto
  • web3
  • developers
  • security

Frequently asked questions

What does doxxed mean in crypto?

A doxxed developer or team is one whose real name and face are public, usually by choice. A pseudonymous developer works under a stable handle that is not their legal name.

What is the difference between anonymous and pseudonymous?

An anonymous contributor leaves no stable identity behind, so you cannot check their past. A pseudonymous developer keeps the same handle across projects. Over time that handle builds a track record you can verify: code, audit results and references.

Is it safe to hire a developer who isn't doxxed?

It can be, if you check their public work, test them on a paid task and limit what they can do alone. The main protections are access given in steps, a multisig wallet that needs several people to approve each payment, and a second person who reviews every code change.

Should I insist on a video call?

A live call with the camera on is a fair request, even if the person keeps their name private. Some fake candidates have used face-swapping software in video interviews, so treat the call as one check among several.

Newsletter

I agree to receive the Other--Side newsletter. Unsubscribe at any time. Privacy policy

Further reading

  • How do you set up a paid test task when hiring a developer?

    An interview shows how a developer talks about code, and a paid test task shows how they write it. Here is how to choose the task, write the brief, set the fee, keep your funds and code out of reach, judge the result, and then choose between a trial contract and a direct hire.

    8 min read

  • How do you pay developers in crypto as an employer?

    A growing share of developers in crypto and web3 ask to be paid in crypto. This guide explains the options for an employer, from a company wallet to a payroll platform, and what changes in fees, records and tax.

    8 min read

  • Where can you hire crypto developers beyond LinkedIn?

    Many crypto developers have no LinkedIn profile and work under a pseudonym, but their code is public. This guide shows where they spend their time, how each community works, and how to write to someone without being ignored or banned.

    7 min read